미국 프로미식축구팀 마이애미 돌핀스의 국제 치어리더를 뽑는 멕시코 오디션에서 최종 오디션에 참가할 4인이 선발됐다. 이들은 콜롬비아, 아르헨티나, 브라질 등 각국에서 선발된 치어리더들과 오는 5월 1일 마이애미에서 경쟁을 펼칠 예정이다. 사진=마이애미 돌핀스·TOPIC / SPLASH NEWS(www.topicimages.com) 온라인뉴스부 iseoul@seoul.co.kr

자, 열심히 공부하고 있는 사람을 떠올려 봅시다. 그 사람은 어떤 표정을 짓고 있나요? 혹시 잔뜩 진지한 얼굴을 한 채 두꺼운 책에 시선을 떼지 않고 있지는 않은가요? 만일 그렇다면, 당신은 학창 시절에 우울했던 경험과 힘겹게 공부해왔던 기억을 투영시키고 있을 겁니다. 이러한 기억 탓에 공부가 눈살을 찌푸리게 하고 엄청난 스트레스가 된다고 무의식적으로 생각하고 있을지도 모릅니다. 그런데 최근 미국 월간 경제 매거진 INC닷컴은 여러 연구논문과 전문가의 조언을 인용해 새로운 것을 빨리 습득하려면 공부에 집중하느라 찡그린 얼굴이 되는 것보다 웃으면서 즐겁게 배우는 것이 효율이 더 크다고 밝혔습니다. 이는 학습에 웃음을 도입하면 효율이 높아진다는 것입니다. ■ 나이와 상관없이 즐기면서 배우면 학습 속도가 빨라진다 웃음을 집어넣은 학습의 효과는 어렸을 때부터 현저하게 나타난다고 행동 과학자이자 유명 작가인 수잔 바인셍크 박사는 최근 자신의 블로그에 밝혔습니다. 수잔 바인셍크 박사는 해당 게시글에서 다음과 같은 시나리오를 공개하고 있는데 대부분 부모가 공감할지도 모릅니다. “당신이 생후 18개월 된 딸에게 태블릿 PC로 학습용 게임을 하게 한다고 생각해보세요. 당신은 서너 개의 애플리케이션(응용프로그램, 이하 앱)을 내려받아 아이에게 어느 것을 하게 할지 고민하게 됩니다. 음악을 사용해 숫자와 문자의 개념을 배울 수 있는 꽤 진지한 앱이 좋을까? 아니면 유치한 동물이 끊임없이 등장해 화면 속을 돌아다니며 아이를 웃게 하는 앱이 좋을까? 많은 사람이 더 진지한 앱을 더 교육적이라고 생각할지도 모르지만 과학은 그와 반대로 아이를 최대한 웃게 하는 것을 권장합니다” 이는 바인셍크 박사가 걸음마를 배우는 시기에 있는 아이들을 두 그룹으로 나눠 학습시킨 결과를 비교한 한 연구논문을 인용하면서 밝힌 내용입니다. 이 연구에서 한 그룹은 학습 동안 웃는 요소가 있어 웃으며 배웠고 나머지 그룹은 그렇지 않은 상태에서 학습했다고 합니다. 이에 대해 바인셍크 박사는 “웃으면서 학습한 아이들은 웃음 없이 학습한 이들보다 더 많은 학습 목표를 달성했습니다”라고 설명합니다. 이는 실제로 아이에게 TV나 태블릿 화면으로 무엇을 보여줘야 좋을지 고민하는 부모들에게는 흥미로운 이야기일 수 있습니다. 그런데 만일 아이가 아니더라도 즐기면서 공부하면 학습 효율을 높일 수 있는 것일까요? 이런 의문에 많은 연구논문은 “그렇다”라고 답합니다. 한 연구논문은 성인을 대상으로 한 온라인 수업에 농담과 유머 요소를 넣으면 학습 효과가 오르는 것을 입증했으며, 학술지 ‘컬리지 티칭’(College Teaching)에 발표된 한 연구는 수강자를 웃게 하는 강의야말로 학습 효과가 높인다고 주장합니다. 이외에도 웃음은 성인의 기억력을 강화할 수 있다는 연구논문이 있습니다. 심지어 우리는 현실을 그대로 전하는 뉴스보다 재미있고 우화에 가까운 뉴스를 더 잘 기억하고 있습니다. 이에 대해 고등학교 영어 교사인 사라 헨더슨은 교육정보 사이트 에듀토피아(Edutopia)에서 “퓨리서치센터의 여론조사에 따르면, ‘더 데일리 쇼’(The Daily Show)나 ‘더 콜버트 리포트’(The Colbert Report)와 같이 유머러스한 뉴스 프로그램을 보는 사람 쪽이 신문이나 CNN, 폭스 뉴스 등 네트워크 방송사 등에서 뉴스를 읽거나 본 사람보다 내용을 잘 기억하고 있었습니다”라고 지적합니다. ■ 과학이 보여주는 유머를 이용한 학습 효과 그렇다면 웃음이 정보의 이해와 기억에 도움이 되는 이유는 무엇일까요? 에듀토피아에서 블로그를 운영 중인 헨더슨 교사는 “유머는 뇌의 도파민 보상체계를 체계적으로 활성화하는 것이 신경과학 연구로 밝혀지고 있습니다”고 말합니다. 또 “도파민은 목표지향적인 동기와 장기 기억 모두에 중요하다는 것을 보여주는 인지 연구를 비롯해 유치원생부터 대학생에 이르는 모든 학습자의 기억력을 향상하게 하려면 학습에 유머를 적절하게 개입하는 것이 효과적이라는 교육 연구도 있습니다”라고 설명합니다. 따라서 당신이 다음에 무언가를 학습할 때는 필기구와 노트만 챙겨서는 안 될 것입니다. 어떻게 해야 공부를 즐겁게 할 수 있는지 잠시 생각해봅시다. 예를 들어 단어를 기억하기 쉽게 짤막한 재미있는 이야기를 만들어보는 것도 하나의 효과적인 방법이 될 수 있습니다. 당신이 더 즐겁게 공부할 수 있다면 아마도 그 효과는 더 커질 것입니다. 사진=ⓒ포토리아(맨위부터 순서대로), 트위터, 에듀토피아 윤태희 기자 th20022@seoul.co.kr

배우겸 모델 대프니 조이(Daphne Joy)가 13일(현지시간) 멕시코 푼타 미타의 카사 아라마라에서 휴가를 즐기는 모습이 미국 연예매체 스플래쉬닷컴에 포착됐다. 최소한의 부위만 가린 붉은색 비키니는 대프니 조이의 풍만하고 환상적인 몸매를 그대로 드러내고 있다. 사진=TOPIC / SPLASH NEWS(www.topicimages.com) 온라인뉴스부 iseoul@seoul.co.kr

아르헨티나 출신 모델 카리나 옐리네크(Karina Jelinek)가 13일(현지시간) 미국 마이애미 비치에서 사진 촬영 중 의상 불량으로 의상을 갈아입고 있는 모습이 미국 연예매체 스플래쉬닷컴에 포착됐다. 사진=TOPIC / SPLASH NEWS(www.topicimages.com) 온라인뉴스부 iseoul@seoul.co.kr

팝가수 제이슨 데룰로와 여자친구 대프니 조이가 9일(현지시간) 멕시코 푼타 미타의 카사 아라마라에서 휴가를 즐기는 모습이 미국 연예매체 스플래쉬닷컴에 포착됐다. 그들은 물장난을 치거나 키스를 하는 등 다정한 연인의 모습을 보여줬다. 사진=TOPIC / SPLASH NEWS(www.topicimages.com) 온라인뉴스부 iseoul@seoul.co.kr

머리가 투명해 그 안이 훤히 들여다보이는 기괴한 외모를 가진 심해어가 인터넷상에서 화제를 일으켰다. ‘매크로핀나 미크로스토마’(Macropinna microstoma)라는 학명을 갖고 있다. 4일(현지시간) 동물전문 매체 더 도도에 따르면, 이 심해어는 머리가 투명한 돔 형태의 막으로 덮여 있으며 원통형의 눈을 갖고 있다. 원통형 눈이라는 말에 다소 의아한 생각이 들 수 있는 데 사진 속 심해어의 얼굴에서 눈처럼 보이는 돌출 부분은 사실 후각 기관인 콧 구멍이다. 실제 눈은 투명한 머릿속에 보이는 밝은 노란색 기관 앞에 있는 갈색 원통처럼 생긴 부위라고 한다. 이 심해어는 수심 약 600~800m 심해에서 움직이지 않고 떠 있다가 먹이가 내려오면 이 눈으로 확인하고 몸을 움직여 사냥한다. 먹이는 해파리 등이 있는 데 머리 안에 눈이 있는 이유가 해파리의 촉수로부터 눈을 보호하기 위한 것이라고 과학자들은 추정하고 있다. 한편 이 심해어는 1939년에 처음 목격됐으며 2004년에 미국 몬터레이만 해양연구소(MBARI)에 의해 그 모습이 처음 촬영됐다. 사진=임거 윤태희 기자 th20022@seoul.co.kr

러시아출신 팝스타 나디아 볼리아노바가 9일(현지시간) 미국 브렌트우드에서 엉덩이 부분만 오려진 청바지를 입은 모습이 미국 연예매체 스플래쉬닷컴에 포착됐다. 사진=TOPIC / SPLASH NEWS(www.topicimages.com) 온라인뉴스부 iseoul@seoul.co.kr

7일(현지시간) 아르헨티나 부에노스아이레스에서 열린 프로미식축구팀 마이애미 돌핀스의 국제 치어리더 오디션에 참가한 지원자가 기량을 뽐내고 있다. 이번에 선발된 후보자들은 오는 5월 마이애미에서 최종 오디션을 통해 마이애미 돌핀스의 치어리더로 입단할 예정이다. 사진=마이애미 돌핀스·TOPIC / SPLASH NEWS(www.topicimages.com) 온라인뉴스부 iseoul@seoul.co.kr

타쉬 오클리와 데빈 부르크만이 7일(현지시간) 호주 본다이 비치에서 채널 ‘E!’의 프로그램 ‘The Hype’의 촬영을 위해 사회자 크세니야 루키치와 함께 대화를 나누며 대기 중에 있는 모습이 미국 연예매체 스플래쉬닷컴에 포탁됐다.사진=TOPIC / SPLASH NEWS(www.topicimages.com)　 온라인뉴스부 iseoul@seoul.co.kr

7일(현지시간) 아르헨티나 부에노스아이레스에서 열린 프로미식축구팀 마이애미 돌핀스의 국제 치어리더 오디션에 100명이 넘는 지원자가 몰렸다. 이번에 선발된 후보자들은 오는 5월 마이애미에서 최종 오디션을 통해 마이애미 돌핀스의 치어리더로 입단할 예정이다. 사진=마이애미 돌핀스·TOPIC / SPLASH NEWS(www.topicimages.com)　 온라인뉴스부 iseoul@seoul.co.kr

5일(현지시간) 오스트레일리아 시드니에서 열린 ‘2016 시드니 마디그라 게이&레즈비언 축제(Sydney Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras Parade)’ 참자가들이 가슴을 드러내고 축제를 즐기는 모습이 미국 연예매체 스플래쉬닷컴에 포착됐다. 세계 최대 규모의 동성애 축제중 하나인 마디그라는 1만2500명의 참자가와 20만명이 넘는 관객들이 모여 시드니 중심가에서 댄스파티 등 거리행진을 하며 밤새 축제를 즐긴다. 사진=TOPIC / SPLASH NEWS(www.topicimages.com) 온라인뉴스부 iseoul@seoul.co.kr

할리우드 배우 벨라 손이 3일(현지시간) 미국 캘리포니아주 말리부의 주마 비치에서 사진 촬영 도중 티셔츠가 말려 올라가 비키니를 입은 상체가 드러난 모습이 미국 연예매체 스플래쉬닷컴에 포착됐다.사진=TOPIC / SPLASH NEWS(www.topicimages.com) 온라인뉴스부 iseoul@seoul.co.kr

?It is common for the authors to include epilogues, however, yours was especially sincere and full of countless thank you-s. Humans are quite similar in genetic aspects(you even mentioned that the reason Kenya became a powerful nation in track-and-field is because it did not lose the talented ones to other sports). Sport is a way of exploring the inner-conscience, so enjoy. Such conclusion seemed a little bit cliche-tic in the first place, pardon me, but as I thought about it more and more, it seems to be a really valuable conclusion. It has been already two years since you wrote the book. If you have the chance to write the epilogue once again, what are the changes that you would want to make? -Haha…well, I think maybe I would try to make that sentence a little less cliche! And I always appreciate feedback, so there is no need for pardon whatsoever. For me, sport is the ultimate lens through which to examine human biological diversity. You can watch the opening ceremony in Rio this summer, and there will be Michael Phelps next to a 1500-meter runner as they walk in, and Phelps will be 18cm taller, but both men will be wearing the same length pants, because of the bodytypes that are advantaged in their respective sports. I find that beautiful and remarkable, if a bit cliche. I really didn’t think so many people would be interested in the book, so I didn’t have an audience in mind so much when I wrote the epilogue, it was more sort of wrapping things up in my own mind. So that’s why I mentioned a wide range of characters from NBA players to Steve Jobs, and discussed the idea of genetic engineering for a perfect athlete. It was just addressing many different things I had been thinking about, almost like I was talking to myself. I think if I could do it again, I would have made a more explicit section of the epilogue where I said: “Here, in short, are aspects of this research that have most influenced how I work outside of sports,” and suggest how they might apply to other people. For example, when I’m trying to learn something new now, I sample a range of techniques first, and pay attention to my learning rate, or “trainability” as I call it in the book. It pays off to spend some time up front finding the method in which you are most trainable. You may be behind at first, but it’s the best way to go. And using some of the information about how athletes “chunk” information to make quick decisions, I’ve applied some of that to learning information quickly, and I can now memorize full hour-long lectures even though I don’t think I have a special memory. So I think I would have taken some time to give a bit more of the practical, utilitarian background. I would still like to do that! ?You worked as a researcher in Alaska near the North Pole, wrote articles while traveling on a yacht... you have been consistently involved in environment and sports-science. You are now working as a journalist for Propublica. Your TED lecture ‘Are Athletes Really Getting Faster, Better, Stronger?’ from 2014 was watched by a quite large number of people in Korea as well. You seem like a person who is consistently interested in new things and inflamed by new topics. Do you have a personal life moto? Is there a specific field that you are especially interested in and working on in these days? -When I lived on the boat, a large research vessel, I was actually doing science, not writing articles yet. I wasn’t a journalist yet, and still thought I would be a scientist. But the more science I did, the more I asked myself: “Am I the type of person who wants to spend my whole life learning or two things new to the world? Or am I the type who wants to learn things new to me more often?” I decided I was the latter, and later realized you really can connect dots that even the scientists haven’t, because they have to focus very narrowly. I jumped from being a scientist to a journalist, and then from all sorts of different jobs. I left a fulltime job in Washington D.C., to take a temporary six-month job as a fact-checker at Sports Illustrated. I don’t know that I have a motto, but just as the development of the best athletes involves diversification prior to specialization, I want my experience to be very wide early in my career. When my learning curve begins to flatten, I want to be somewhere else. That’s difficult, because the pressure is to create a brand and stick to the same thing. But I just can’t. I think we too often progress in life by continually moving more and more toward what we are comfortable with. I want to spend my entire life forcing myself to try things and engage with ideas that I don’t find entirely comfortable. It’s the same with physical training. If you lift the same weight the same number of times every day, you will maintain your muscle, but you won’t force it to change for the better. Right now, I just finished a long story about drug cartels in Mexico, which was a new field for me, and fascinating to understand how those organizations get very good at doing very bad things. It definitely made me wonder about how leadership is structured in organizations, so I’ve been reading some of the psychology about that. And I’m also taking a fiction writing class, because, again, I want to get out of my comfort-zone, and force myself to try a kind of writing that I’m not comfortable with. It’s working! ?Your book was selected as a New York Times bestseller. Moreover, the photo of your book with President Obama was a hot issue as well. I wonder, had the President ever mentioned about the book himself or wrote you an email or mentioned in his SNS about the book. -The President never wrote to me, as I think he probably has a pretty busy schedule! Interestingly, former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice mentioned in an interview that she was reading The Sports Gene as well. I enjoyed that, because she and President Obama are from different political parties obviously, and I was glad to think that perhaps people with very different viewpoints might be interested in it. I did see one interview online where President Obama was speaking with a runner who visited the White House, and told her some things about talent, and it made me think he had definitely paid attention to what he read in my book, as it sounded like it was straight from the pages. ?There was this video of you having a heated conversation in MIT with Malcom Gladwell, the founder of 1 million-hours-law. Are you still in an argument with him? -He and I still do discuss it, because we run together. But we have become very friendly. That doesn’t mean we agree, but my feeling is that he has gravitated somehwat more toward the evidence I’ve presented. I give him a huge amount of credit for being willing to change his mind when presented with evidence. He contends that the point of the law or “rule,” as he phrased it, was to show the importance of hard and sustained work. But that was never in question among scientists in the area, and I think the way that it has been applied is often a mistake. As I noted in my book, the scientist who did the actual work that led to the law has been pretty upset at what the public thinks it is. So I hope I helped correct that for people who are interested, although I certainly can’t reach as many people as Gladwell. ?You answered that ‘Phelps will be 18cm taller(than EL GUERROUJ), but both men will be wearing the same length pants, because of the body types that are advantaged in their respective sports. I find that beautiful and remarkable, if a bit cliche’. Could you explain further about why is that ’beautiful and remarkable‘? -In the early part of the 20th Century, there was an idea that there was an ideal way for all humans to be, and that anything different from that was bad. It deviated by fault or error. Instead, now that we better understand biological variation, it’s clear that tremendous variation is an essential part of evolution. There is no “perfect form,” only those that fit more readily into one environment or task than another. As such, I see sports as a celebration of humanity‘s physiological diversity. Some people have asked me if all these specialized body types take away some of the magic of sports for me. On the contrary, I think sports is a grand stage for appreciating biological diversity. Sports are simply contrived environments that we’ve created to test our psychology and biology. To me, the wider the range, the more interesting, and the more power sport has to appeal to everyone. I feel the same way about culture. I love the Olympics because it mixes cultures on a scale I don‘t think is really replicated just about anywhere else, and I like to see how that manifests. In short: at times human diversity is divisive, but in sport, it’s part of the celebration of achievement. Who is Epstein? He was born in Chicago, Illinois on the 31st of January, 1980. He majored in Environmental science and astronomy in Columbia University. He worked as an environmental research worker in the Artic Circle near Alaska. He also worked at the a seismological laboratory and charted the submarine topography of the Mediterranean ocean. As a sport-illustrate senior contributor, he is a celebrated journalists who writes sports-science and Olympics stories through careful research and checking, such as breaking the story that the Yankees‘ Alex Rodriguez, the tycoon of baseball was tested positive for steroids. He included his experience of being a varsity track-and-fields runner with teammates who came from Jamaica and Kenya and of working in the sports scenes in his book ‘The Sports Gene’, 2013. President Obama’s picture of buying the book at the bookstore was sensational. Also, Condoleezza Rice, the former secretary of state also recommended her acquaintances to read the book. Now he is working at the public benefit media ‘Propublica’ as a journalist and recently covered the story of the Mexican drug cartel’s local relief activity. Senior reporter Byong Sun Nim bsnim@seoul.co.kr

Can a genetic test tell whether my child who seems to be talented in sports will be able to succeed as a professional? When is the best time to select the right sport? If the child puts in efforts of more than 1 million hours, will he/she have the ability that no one can possibly think of challenging? There might be a quite large number of parents with such questions. David Epstein, the American sports-science journalist who published ‘The Sports Gene’ in 2013 advised through the e-mail interview that ‘There is no such test like that at the moment. It is actually best to experience diverse kinds of sports in one’s adolescence and choose a certain sport when one comes of age, being able to check one‘s degree of achievement and concentrate fully on the choosen sport’. Apart from certain sports such as golf and gymnastics, too much of either early or immersion education is not recommendable in sports. Following are the Q&As. ?First, I have to confess that I was personally touched by the well-done research and committed interviews. I guess that the time for writing took much longer than you had expected. Also, what were the reasons that you decided to write this book and how much are you satisfied with the outcome? -The research time for the book did indeed take longer than I expected. The topic was so complex, and there was, unfortunately, a lot of poorly done science I had to sift through to find the best work. (I was lucky I had a science background that helped with that.) For the first year, I did not write a word, I only tried to read 10 scientific papers a day, every day. As far as why I decided to write the book, it really came out of my own experience as an athlete, and as a sports spectator. I grew up in an area outside of Chicago where I ran on high school track teams with a lof of Jamaican immigrants. We had so many amazing sprinters, and when I realized Jamaica was an island of 2.5 million people, I wondered what could possibly be going on there to make so many fast sprinters?! And then in college, I moved up to run longer distance, and now I was running against Kenyan athletes, and learning that they weren’t just Kenyan, they were all from one small minority tribe, the Kalenjin. So, again, I’m wondering: What in the world is going on over there? Those questions combined with things I would see on television, like a women’s softball pitcher striking out the best Major League hitters. As soon as I saw that, I made an estimate calculation of the speed of her pitch and the closer distance of the mound to see if there was less time to swing, and there wasn’t, so I wondered why the men couldn’t hit it. So I just kept keeping all these questions in my mind, and when I had the opportunity, I wanted to go as far toward answering them as possible using the best available science. So really it was my own curiosities, and I didn’t know that so many other people would be interested. ?Your book‘s greatest strength may be that the readers can go through your experience as a varsity track-and-field player for 800 meters and also the interviews with Barry Bonds and Jennie Finch. Your theory of knowledge bulk was really intriguing as well. So, what you really wanted to say is that one cannot choose between nature and nurture. Concentrated workouts are important, however, there is no need to put in 1 million hours of work. One can experience diverse kinds of sports while he/she is young and then once he/she comes of age, he/she can choose one specific filed and put in his/her efforts. This is what you offer as an advice for parents who have kids that seem to be talented with sports. Is it right? -That’s right. The science has moved past the question of “nature or nurture,” and on to attempting to figure out what the balance of nature and nurture is in any specific situation. Without both genes and environments, there are no outcomes at all. So the real quest is to understand the interplay of nature and nurture, and how we can best use it. And this is important, because some people asked me after the book came out why scientists even study genetics if we can’t change it. The answer is that we can alter environments so that people get more out of their genetics. That’s why I use that quote toward the end of the book by J.M. Tanner?who was the world’s expert in body growth and development, and was a worldclass athlete: “Everyone has a different genotype. Therefore, for optimal development, everyone should have a different environment.” The more we understand about nature, the more we can help tailor the nurture to help everyone get the best out of themselves. As far as putting in hours of work, you’re exactly right. There is no magic number of hours. When I went through the work about the 10,000-hours rule, I expected to find something amazing I could write about. But what I found was work filled with statistical problems that needed to be addressed, because it’s actually damaging the development of athletes. The actual research shows that the typical route to success in most sports?and in fact many other activities?is to have a “sampling period,” where the learner has exposure to a wide variety of skills early, before then focusing in and specializing. That’s why I added an afterword to the book, and you can see, on pages 416 and 417, I added the charts with the aggregate data that show the development path of elite athletes. They sample sports early, and practice less and in a less technical manner early on than their peers who plateau at lower levels. There are exceptions, of course, and golf may be one because it’s a very unusual endeavor, in which the athlete is not time limited and does not need to predict the actions of others. But the fact is, most performers who go on to become elite do not follow the Tiger Woods path of early specialization. They follow the Roger Federer path; his parents forced him not to focus on tennis too early, and to continue playing badminton, basketball, and soccer before he could specialize. That’s the norm for those who become creative adult athletes. (And, by the way, there is evidence the best musicians do this as well.) Still, even looking at the data, people often don’t believe me. They send me messages: “Ok, maybe in some American sport that’s true, but never in soccer!” Well, luckily for me, shortly after the German national team won the World Cup, this study came out showing that they followed this exact pattern as well. The best players spent more time in unstructured activities as kids, and put off full specialization until after their less skilled peers. The study is called “Practice and play in the development of German top-level professional football players.” As an aside, Malcolm Gladwell and I had a public debate about this, and he conceeded that he didn’t expect people to take the 10,000-hours so seriously. You can see it here on YouTube. He and I have become running partners, so we continue to discuss on our own time! ?What was the most difficult part of writing the book? Even though you are an investigative reporter, it would have not been easy to do interviews while traveling since you would have to check the sources and work on the drafts on the plane. -Well, I didn’t have to do too much on planes, because I took a long time to write the book. When I chose my publisher, my priority was not the best financial offer, but the publisher that would make me an equal partner in determining how long I needed in order to write the book. In some ways, I still felt rushed, but I didn’t want to be on the normal timeline of one year or 18 months, because I knew I needed to learn a lot of material. So that was ok. It was a challenge, though, to arrange some of the interviews. In the last chapter of the book, I tracked down a man who was living as a reindeer farmer in the Arctic, and didn’t speak English, and it took me a while even to figure out that he was still alive and I should go visit him! Really, though, there were two aspects that stood out as very difficult: 1) If I wanted to give an honest examination of the top, I had to write about race and gender, and those are very sensitive topics. I got my CV ready just in case I had to find a new job. 2) I learned that some of my own intuition about the world was incorrect. I learned how hard it is, even faced with the data, to change my mind about certain things I believed for a long time and wanted to continue believing. It just took me some time to come to terms with that and write honestly about the data. For example, the chapters about genetic diversity in Africa, and about how physiology influences the willpower to train, were at first hard for me to digest intellectually, because much of the information was contrary to my intuition. But, in the end, that is why we have science, because we can’t rely on our intuition. --------------------- Two-thirds of Koreans have the gene which can pass through the doping(prohibited substances) test? David Epstein’s book ‘The Sports Gene(Translated version p.213)’ contains dangerous content that can instill a false belief on a quite large number of athletes in this nation. Swedish scientist Jenny Jakobsson Schulz, utilizing data from both Sweden and Inha University Hospital in Incheon, found out a scandalising fact. Those who have a pair of the gene mutant ‘UGT2B17’, which has the ability to cheat the most common anti-doping screening test ‘T/E ratio’, were more commonly found in East asia. The team actually mentioned that especially two thirds of Kroeans have this mutant. The T/E ratio test which searches for the ratio of testosterone to another hormone called epitestosterone views the ratio of 1:1 as normal and if the ratio goes above 4:1, than that there is a possiblity of doping. The research team determined that a lot of people have a gene that influences how they excrete testosterone in their urine, and they can dope without the T/E ratio changing, so they will still pass the test. They recommend that for drug testing to be more effective, it would have to be genetically tailored. On the 23rd of the last month, I requested an authority from Korean Anti-Doping Association(KADA) about how much of this is true and how much information do the domestic researchers and the KADA have on this news. Epstein further explained on this by answering “When I too asked anti-doping officials about this work, some of them said, ‘Oh no, it’s fine, that’s not right.’ Or, ‘That’s very rare.’ But it is right, and it’s not rare, so they are in denial.” “The good news, though, is that the T/E ratio test is becoming less important, as technologies like the biological passport are taking over.” He added, “Christiane Ayotte, one of the top anti-doping scientists in the world, was more honest. She told me, ‘This is one reason why I can’t retire until we have a better screening test than the T/E ratio.’. KADA Education-PR deputy answered on the 3rd, ”T/E ratio is just a primary testing method and is not used as a decisive material for the doping judgement. For example, we use secondary test methods such as IRMS, and also a biological informational system with diverse information for making the final conclusion. So, passing the T/E ratio test does not mean that one can avoid the doping test.” Senior reporter Byong Sun Nim bsnim@seoul.co.kr

폴란드 출신 모델 조안나 크루파가 충격적인 누드 광고사진을 찍었다. 미국 연예매체 스플래쉬닷컴은 2일(현지시간) 조안나 크루파가 전라의 모습으로 털이 깎인 채 피를 흘리고 있는 양을 안고 있는 동물보호단체 PETA의 ‘울:벌거벗은 진실(Wool: The Naked Truth)’이라는 광고사진을 게재했다. 크루파는 아무것도 걸치지 않은 누드에 상처입고 피를 흘리는 분장으로 보는 이로 하여금 경각심을 일으키게 하고 있다. 사진=TOPIC / SPLASH NEWS(www.topicimages.com) 온라인뉴스부 iseoul@seoul.co.kr

1일(현지시간) 일본 도쿄에서 ‘2016 미스 유니버스 재팬(Miss Universe Japan)’ 선발대회가 열렸다. 미국 연예매체 스플래쉬 닷컴은 이번 미인대회에 출전한 참가자들의 수영복 사진을 공개했다. 왕관은 기사현 출신의 여대생 나카자와 사리가 차지했다. 사진=TOPIC / SPLASH NEWS(www.topicimages.com) 온라인뉴스부 iseoul@seoul.co.kr

러시아 출신 팝스타 나디아 볼리아노바(Nadia Volianova)가 미국 로스앤젤레스 베버리힐즈호텔에서 열린 아카데미상 수상자 디너 파티에 과감한 노출 패션을 선보였다. 미국 연예매체 스플래쉬닷컴은 28일(현지시간) ‘100인의 스타 오스카 갈라 파티(Night of 100 Stars Oscar awards viewing gala)’에 나디아 볼리아노바가 속살이 보이는 핑크색 레이스 드레스에 과감한 앞트임으로 맨다리는 물론 팬티까지 아슬아슬하게 보이는 의상으로 참석해 주변의 시선을 모으는 장면을 포착했다. 사진=TOPIC / SPLASH NEWS(www.topicimages.com) 온라인뉴스부 iseoul@seoul.co.kr

페이스북 최고경영자(CEO) 마크 저커버그(32)가 경호원들과 함께 조깅하는 모습이 포착돼 관심을 끌고 있다. 지난 25일(이하 현지시간) 독일 일간지 타게스 슈피겔등 현지 언론은 이날 베를린 시내에서 조깅 중인 저커버그의 모습을 사진과 함께 보도했다. 저커버그의 조깅까지 언론의 주목을 받고있는 것은 얼마 전 수니파 급진 무장세력 이슬람국가(IS)의 협박 때문이다. IS 측은 저커버그와 잭 도시 트위터 CEO 얼굴에 총알이 박혀있는 영상을 공개하며 "당신 사이트는 물론 이름도 사라지게 하겠다"는 살해 협박 메시지를 공개했다. 이에 IS 타깃이 된 저커버그의 경호가 한층 강화된 것. 이날 저커버그는 5명 이상의 수행단들과 함께 시내 조깅에 나섰으며 상의는 유니폼처럼 입고 다니는 회색 티셔츠를, 특히 한 손에는 아이폰을 들고 뛰었다. 보도에 따르면 캘리포니아주 팔로알토에 있는 저커버그의 집은 16명의 경호원들이 지키며 혹시 있을지 모를 테러에 대비하고 있는 것으로 알려졌다. 지난 21일 스페인 바르셀로나에서 열린 삼성전자 갤럭시 S7 언팩 행사에 깜짝 등장해 화제가 된 저커버그가 베를린에 나타난 이유는 상을 받기 위해서다. 이날 저커버그는 독일 최대 미디어그룹 악셀슈프링거에서 제정한 ‘악셀슈프링거상’ 수상자로 선정돼 시상식에 참석했다. 이날 강연에서도 저커버그는 인공지능(AI)과 가상현실(VR) 분야의 무궁무진한 가능성을 또다시 강조했다. 　 사진=TOPIC / SPLASH NEWS(www.topicimages.com) 박종익 기자 pji@seoul.co.kr

제니퍼 로페즈가 25일(현지시간) 캘리포니아 웨스트 할리우드에서 열린 아메리칸 아이돌 XV 결승진출자 파티에 도착해 포즈를 취하고 있다. 사진=TOPIC / SPLASH NEWS(www.topicimages.com) 온라인뉴스부 iseoul@seoul.co.kr

‘셀러브리티 리햅’ 스타 메리 캐리가 25일(현지시간) 캘리포니아 스튜디오 시티 공원에서 운동하는 동안 놀라운 유연성을 보여주고 있다.사진=TOPIC / SPLASH NEWS(www.topicimages.com) 온라인뉴스부 iseoul@seoul.co.kr